Amidst these opportunities, Dodo grapples with a multitude of challenges. Student volunteers are often managing busy schedules, and these time constraints impact the organisation. Additionally, the NGO experiences difficulties in attracting committed members, as individuals often opt for financially compensated jobs instead. This also applies to engagement in activities, as people may be interested in joining the event but do not necessarily have the capacity to be involved in the planning process. The balance between short-term and long-term planning poses a persistent issue, impacting the organisation's ability to secure new members and transfer knowledge effectively. While the year-by-year planning opens up possibilities to include input from motivated members who are committed for a short period of time, this is accompanied by an overall uncertainty that negatively impacts the organisation’s stability.
Financial instability, lack of media visibility, and the responsibility for individual actions further compound the challenges faced by Dodo. The NGO faces financial hurdles due to changes in the eligibility criteria for state funding of the Ministry of Education and Culture, rendering them ineligible for government support as a national NGO. There are possibilities to collaborate with the city to set up urban gardening initiatives, but the organisational procedure is not optimal and is relatively short-lived. Private people can rent gardening areas through Dodo, which involves a long-term rental agreement with the city. However, if these individuals are unreliable, there is a lack of accountability and resources to follow-up and react to unforeseen changes, leaving Dodo in a challenging situation. Consequently, Dodo incurs costs for space rental and fixed employee wages and other costs. Moreover, the organisation struggles to maintain a stable income, heavily relying on successful events funded by external sources, as local funding remains limited.