Go to content
Photo: Getty Images/unsplash.com

Cultivating knowledge in connection with education and science  

Campus Roslagen delivers professional aquaponics education 

Campus Roslagen has been a frontrunner in aquaponics education in the Nordic-Baltic Region, performing an essential role in the qualification and development of new skills for urban farmers. 
Campus Roslagen offers several courses for professional education (e.g., nurses, solar energy designer, wind farm technicians). Since 2021, they have filled a gap in the education of urban farmers by providing technical education on aquaponics. The course has attracted a broad, diversified public showing the growing popularity of aquaponics has and its potential to produce food regardless of climate conditions. 
The seed idea of developing an educational programme on aquaponics began with the involvement of Campus Roslagen in a project financed by LEADER (a programme for rural development of the Stockholm Region). This project focused on raising awareness, informing the general public about aquaponics technology, and investigating the hindrances in uptake since, despite being developed in the early 1970s, the technology has not yet found its niche in the market. The lack of proper education to handle both plants and fish in a closed system was one of the main outcomes of this investigation. As Donatella Acquaviva, who is a project manager at Campus Roslagen, says:  
(…) One of the results of our LEADER project was the mapping of education in Europe. There are short courses on aquaponics around Europe as well as PhD courses, but these are at a higher level. Even the master level lacks courses on aquaponics. Maybe there are a few seminars, but systematic education does not exist. That is why Campus Roslagen applied for vocational training in aquaponics. 
The two-year aquaponics educational programme is free of charge, and candidates who provide evidence of low income or are outside the labour market can get a scholarship to support their studies. Students earn 120 ECTS points through the curriculum, which is structured in four parts: (1) plants; (2) fish; (3) aquaponic system components, and (4) project management and entrepreneurship. This structure was formulated to equip students with technical knowledge to design, operate, and understand the functioning of an aquaponic system, including dealing with technical problem-solving. The curriculum also includes a 10-week internship where students gain experience in different sectors of the market (e.g., a school and a company that aimed at installing the system to feed students/employees).
The application process is quite simple: applicants must have a high school degree and basic knowledge of chemistry and mathematics for admission. The hybrid class format, with most parts of the course conducted online and quarterly meetings onsite, has attracted students from different parts of Sweden. A wide range of people have participated in the programme, with ages varying between 18 and 63 years old students coming from diverse educational backgrounds (e.g., lawyers, journalists, teachers, IT workers). This heterogeneity is an asset as different perspectives contribute to an exciting academic environment. 
Aquaponic education at Campus Roslagen, Norrtälje, Sweden
The teachers are mostly consultants with backgrounds in agricultural or veterinarian sciences. They offer insights into applied perspectives on aquaponic systems rather than through a general approach. The division of competencies among the teachers can be a bit challenging as there is a prejudice towards the importance of one field over another. While this aspect unveils challenges in working transdisciplinary, it also reinforces the need to bridge different sciences to consolidate education and foster consensus on the potential of aquaponics. Another aspect that raises concerns about the longevity of the programme is the short-term public financing that ends in 2024. Nevertheless, the great success in attracting 200 applicants in 2021, despite being influenced by the pandemic’s effects on the economy, was followed by a high competition of 100 applicants in 2023 to fill the 20 places the programme offers bi-annually.  
Regarding opportunities, the program creates an added value in offering education that can bring innovation to food systems. Indoor farming is climate independent and can thus strengthen food security and sovereignty, as higher productivity is achieved with a yield of approximately five times more crops per square metre than traditional soil-based methods (FAO, 2014). The contribution this system can have to social inclusion should not go unnoticed as people with physical disabilities can easily engage in agriculture. Besides not requiring much physical effort, the heights and distances between the growing beds can be designed to allow the operation and maintenance of the system by someone in a wheelchair. In addition, the environmental performance with low water usage (around 90% water savings compared to soil-based traditional methods) and the possibility to use heat waste while producing food without pesticides, regardless of the weather conditions, are significant advantages given all the uncertainties brought by the changing climate. Donatella also adds: 
(…) Besides being a great technology to grow food in cities, it also helps to foster entrepreneurship in rural areas. Farmers can diversify their activities, and still work with agriculture, with fish farming. It is something innovative. It also indirectly contributes to biodiversity conservation because it curbs nutrients run-off in the environment and does not use antibiotics nor pesticides. 
Another advantage is the qualification of the students to work not only with aquaponics but also in hydroponics and/or in aquaculture. This is an important aspect considering that, otherwise, the aquaponics slow-growing market would soon be saturated. Donatella views this with some frustration:  
(…) I still don't understand when I find people that say immediately, no (to aquaponics) while other emerging fields are already so advanced. I mean, if we think of Artificial Intelligence, the progress made in this field are incredible. The same with transplants or genetically modified food. These are very complex fields (systems). So why do people say aquaponics is too difficult to handle? (…)  Yeah, maybe it's just a question of competition, for economic reasons. 
With regards to the future, Donatella believes that there is momentum for aquaponics technology to thrive. Despite the high initial investments, the opportunity of using abandoned buildings or underutilised spaces in existing buildings is an alternative to reduce costs. In addition, she sees the qualification in aquaponics as an avenue that opens several opportunities for making a profit that goes beyond food production, including teaching and consultancy. In her words:  
Who is the farmer of nowadays? Maybe he doesn't work on a farm, but perhaps he works in architecture firms or municipalities. 
Box 10: Campus Roslagen aquaponics education: Summary of opportunities 
  • The programme responds to a knowledge gap and offers education that can bring innovation to food systems, which urgently need to change to cope with environmental crises and the increasing demand to feed a growing population. 
  • Students gain flexible skills through different opportunities to work with plants, fish, or with aquaponics. 
  • Growing food with aquaponic systems allows engaging people with disabilities in the agricultural labour market. 
 
Box 11: Campus Roslagen aquaponics education: Summary of challenges 
  • Funding for the programme beyond 2024 remains uncertain. 
  • It is difficult to overcome prejudices against aquaponics systems.  
  • Developing business models can be challenging due to the slow-growing market.  
  • Managing aquaponic systems can be tricky as it involves balancing a whole ecosystem. 

NMBU offers the first master’s programme in urban agriculture of the Nordic Region  

NMBU employs an innovative pedagogical approach to qualify professionals in urban agriculture. Back in 2018, the vision of developing a master’s programme where different disciplines could work together began to turn into reality with the creation of the National Centre for Urban Agriculture. The centre was one of the outcomes of the NMBU leadership in a Horizon 2020 project called Sino-European Innovative Green and Smart Cities (SiEUGreen) that focused on the production of food in cities using waste streams. 
With this background, the master’s programme in urban agriculture was implemented 2021. The programme is unique not only regarding the theme of urban agriculture but also in the pedagogical method that includes a student-active learning approach. This is an open method that gives students independence and flexibility to tailor their education according to their interests. Despite challenges, as courses across seven different faculties (veterinary, business, biotechnology, technology, environmental studies, biosciences, landscape and society) are eligible to be part of the curriculum, this approach actively engages students in their own learning process while attracting a heterogeneous group of students.
Urban Agriculture in Campus Ås; Ås, Norway
As Trine Hvoslef-Eide, researcher in bioscience and director of the master’s programme explains: 
(…) We have a very broad disciplinary approach in our university. We have seven faculties, (…) so it's possible for students to find a topic they're interested in, and to be qualified. This format is attractive not only for plant sciences or biology candidates but also for people with other educational backgrounds. We have students with bachelor’s degrees in fine arts, business, nursing, geography, landscape engineering, economics amongst others. 
The broad scope of urban agriculture includes everything from kitchen benches and balconies to rooftop gardens, community gardens, and professional large scale urban agriculture. This results in a diverse collection of master’s theses including “Food security and urban agriculture: How can private, small-scale, non-commercial cultivation in the city contribute to increased self-sufficiency?” (Pettersen, 2023) and “How a resource center for urban agriculture can provide multidimensional tools for social inclusion” (Trettvik, 2023). In addition, the transdisciplinary approach goes beyond the collaboration across different disciplines by including a partnership with the external network group Pådriv. Pådriv matches the competencies of the students with real challenges faced by municipalities, communities, or private companies, giving students the opportunities to work with tools and skills to address real-world problems.  
The problem-solving approach also benefits municipalities, communities, and private entities facing challenges that can be tackled through urban agriculture. The case studies are not restricted to Norway and have included Svalbard and Mauritius, both of which face enormous challenges in accessing food due to their remote geographies. The recent development of the Norwegian Strategy for Urban Agriculture (Norwegian Ministries, 2021) has strengthened the importance of the programme while also awakening the interest of different municipalities that find in the students an opportunity to get assistance to implement the strategy at the local level. In this strategy, municipalities have been given the responsibility to facilitate for urban agriculture. 
The students work in heterogeneous groups to find alternative solutions for the cases, which are central for their qualification as they provide the empirical basis for the students to reflect on which competencies they lack to address the challenges they need to tackle. The absence of knowledge becomes the parameter for suggesting lectures or for choosing different courses that will be part of their education in the following term. The heterogeneous background of the students is an opportunity for them to realise how their competencies match or diverge. But this is seen as a strength. As Trine says: 
(…) Everybody has something they can bring to the table and please respect both yourself and the others (…) and learn how to collaborate and teach each other. Nevertheless, there are disciplinary terms, what I call the tribal language of a discipline. It's something that they need to get acquainted with (…) to be able to work together. And then they have us as teachers to ask for advice, to help find suitable literature and so on. 
This educational approach is challenging, however, as the students become responsible for their own curriculum while demanding great administrative efficiency and collaboration to coordinate the supply of courses across different faculties. Another barrier is the perception that urban agriculture is just a hobby. As Trine puts it: 
(..) That's one barrier we need to tear down. This can actually be a hobby, but it's important for people's health and well-being. But it's so much more.  
Another challenge to urban agriculture is that it should be conceptualised within circular thinking to better fit the sustainability agenda. This implies growing food by using urban waste streams (e.g., recovering nutrients from black and grey water or organic waste). Nevertheless, it is necessary to do research to ensure safety, to dismantle social resistance, and to adjust the legislation to make this a reality.  
Despite these challenges, Trine sees the future of the master’s programme with optimism. One of the aims for the future is to change the name to programme to Circular Urban Agriculture and offer it in English (from 2024) to attract international students that will contribute even more with the diversification of perspectives. As Trine adds:  
Look at nutrients, we need to recycle sewage because this is the sustainable way of treating our resources. Because it is not waste, it's resources astray. In Oslo for instance, they started with water closets a bit more than 100 years ago. Before that, this was an important resource that was used by the farmers (…). So, we look at the recycling of resources, both the nutrients and the water and how we can clean and save water using vacuum toilets and making biogas from the black water. And if we look at energy, both recycling energy and green energy that we can obtain from the sun and storing energy, using energy from the summer in the winter (…). We look at the whole sustainable society and urban agriculture in our view as the whole. That's why we would like to change it to circular urban agriculture. So urban agriculture is much more than growing carrots. 

Box 12: NMBU master’s programme: Summary of opportunities 
  • The programme employs a unique pedagogical perspective that combines transdisciplinary, student-active learning, and problem-solving approaches.  
  • Circularity of resources is one of the strengthens of the programme which emphasizes technologies to grow food using waste streams (e.g., black, and grey water, organic waste). 
  • The students’ projects and theses respond to the needs of municipalities to include urban agriculture in their agendas and to implement the Norwegian Strategy for Urban Agriculture. 
 
Box 13: NMBU master’s programme: Summary of challenges
  • The implementation of the flexible and open curriculum requires a lot of coordination and efficiency among the seven faculties. 
  • It is difficult to overcome the misconception that urban agriculture is merely a hobby. 
  • It will take a long time to defeat social resistance towards the consumption of food produced with waste streams. 

Roof2Fork: Latvian research on urban agriculture 

Roof2Fork is a research project that investigates the potential of growing food on rooftops. 
In 2023, two research institutions—the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics (AREI) and the Institute of Horticulture—joined forces to study the possibilities and challenges of growing food on rooftops. With financial support from the Latvian Fundamental and Applied Research Programme financing research from diverse fields of knowledge, the project was granted a budget of 300,000 EUR to respond to the lack of knowledge about urban agriculture in the Latvian context. 
Until 2025, when the project ends, a series of research activities will be implemented to provide knowledge to several issues such as a comparison of the quality of food grown in urban and rural environments and testing the effectiveness of light-weight substrates for cultivating food on rooftops, as well as their impact on the yield and quality of food. The project will also deliver guidelines for professionals and practitioners on growing food in the urban environment.
Farming at the rooftop of AREI building, Riga, Latvia
As Linda Ievina, an environmental researcher involved in Roof2Fork, says:  
We see a great potential of this research area as both AREI and the Institute of Horticulture complement each other in their expertise and will be able to deliver relevant, and currently unavailable, information on how to grow food on rooftops.  
AREI has long-standing scientific experience in agriculture, with expertise in sustainable technologies for food production and bioeconomy. The Institute of Horticulture is one of the best research centres in Latvia with proficiency in agrotechnological trials and food quality analysis. With this interdisciplinary team that includes researchers from agronomy, environmental science, chemistry, and spatial planning, Roof2Fork aims to have a great impact on bridging knowledge and strengthening the potential of urban gardening in Latvia. 
The comparison of food produced in urban and rural settings is a stronghold of the project. The rooftop of the AREI building located near the centre of Riga is transformed into an urban farm. Currently, the project team has equipped this space with the infrastructure and equipment such as pallets for growing food, soil sensors for monitoring moisture and temperature, a weather station for collecting meteorological data, ​and ​water supply with a rainwater collection system.
The chemical and biological analysis of the food and soils take a large part of the budget. As Līga Lepse, leading researcher in vegetable production, says: 
A range of different vegetable crops are included in the project to represent leafy vegetables (lettuce), herbs (basil), root vegetables (radish), fruit-yielding vegetables (tomato), and legumes (sugar pea) to clarify their growing peculiarities in the urban gardening approach. The nutritional value of vegetables must be analysed to determine urban-grown food quality in comparison to rural-grown. Besides main nutritional elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S) functional components (phenols, antioxidant activity, carotenes, vitamins and sugars) and undesired heavy metals will be detected in the vegetables. 
Most of the challenges of growing food on rooftops ​are​ associated with the weather, a short growing season, strong winds, and dry periods, all of which pose some uncertainties to achieving an efficient yield. Pests and birds are also of concern as they can jeopardise the development of the crops. Nevertheless, Roof2Fork will provide alternative solutions for overcoming/coping with late spring frosts when the crops are germinating and with drought periods. For example, ​​the collection of rainwater in tanks is an important part of irrigation, as this system will minimise the use of tap water. Furthermore, the protection of the pallets with different covers will assure the safety of the crops against birds, low temperatures, and strong winds.  
Since the researchers involved in the project are responsible for maintaining the rooftop farm, governance and management is not a major challenge; however, this could be an issue for maintaining rooftop gardens in residential or commercial buildings. Community rooftop gardens require a strong commitment from the building association or proper business models that grant the use of the space to entrepreneurs who can exploit it commercially. In addition, building code restrictions, infiltrations, and structural problems may also arise and lead to resistance from the tenants to implement rooftop gardens.  
Despite these challenges, growing ​on​ rooftops can bring several opportunities including the use of underutilised spaces. Besides delivering fresh food and contributing to shortening food supply chains, rooftop gardens can lower the costs otherwise associated with food transportation and contribute to temperature and noise regulation while increasing biodiversity in urban areas. Rooftops can also reduce the environmental impact of buildings, lowering energy consumption while minimising storm runoff. In addition, rooftop farms can become pleasant spaces, providing urban dwellers with the opportunity to enjoy nature in crowded cities.  
The project will deliver guidelines that aim to significantly impact the uptake of rooftop gardening practices in Latvia. Such guidelines will inform practitioners about the resources (knowledge, time, finances)​,​ possibilities (types of farming practices) and challenges (management, irrigation, etc.) of growing food on rooftops. As the leading researcher Pēteris Lakovskis says:   
We have a great potential to develop green infrastructure of the cities, with a great number of buildings with a flat roof that seem to have the structural capacity to host and develop urban farms. 
In the long term, the knowledge gained through Roof2Fork is expected to strengthen the research capacity of both institutions while also raising awareness about the feasibility and importance of growing food in cities. As Līga Lepse mention​s​:  
Everyone who has a suitable place can develop a rooftop farm. It is also a great opportunity for educational institutions (kindergartens and schools) to show children how vegetables are produced in a sustainable and circular approach and teach them to care for plants. In this case, financing bodies, educational institutions, and other stakeholders are invited to consider urban gardening when planning the budget. 
The researchers ​are ​also optimistic about the incorporation of agriculture in cities, with the growing attention it gathers from public and private stakeholders and civil society and how it has been showcased as a pathway for more resilient cities which can provide means to feed the growing urban population. As Linda Ievina says:  
In recent years, urban gardening has been rapidly developing and spreading in Latvia. We are happy about this and willing to foster its development. Thus, we look forward to participating in the research projects in future related to this topic. 

Box 14: Roof2Fork: Summary of opportunities 
  • Besides transforming underutilised spaces into spaces of production, the use of rooftops to grow food also contributes to shorter food supply chains. 
  • Growing food in dense urban environments contributes to temperature and noise reduction while increasing biodiversity in cities. 
  • Rooftop farms contribute to lowering buildings’ energy consumption and minimising urban storm run-off. 
  • Farming in rooftops increases the opportunity for people to enjoy nature in cities and facilitates the education of children and the public about the origin of the food we consume. 
 
Box 15: Roof2Fork: Summary of challenges 
  • The implementation of rooftop farms is dependent ​on​ the structural capacity of buildings and legislation (e.g., building codes permits). 
  • Farming on rooftops may be seen as risky for residents due to infiltrations. 
  • Food grown on the tops of buildings are more exposed to adverse weather conditions (e.g., strong winds, droughts).