Go to content
Photo: Sebastien Goldberg / Unsplash.com

Case 2. Norway – Lofoten

30,000 to 1 – Locals and nature outnumbered

Introduction

Located north of the Arctic Circle, the Lofoten Islands are an archipelago on the Norwegian coast known for the natural beauty. Lofoten is just one area made up of six municipalities (Vågan, Vestvågøy, Flakstad, Moskenes, Værøy, and Røst) that sits within Nordland County (Nordland fylkeskommune). Just under 25,000 people live across the 1,200 km2 of the Lofoten municipalities, with Vestvågøy hosting a large portion of the total population—around 11,600 inhabitants. It is also the home of one of the two main towns in Lofoten—Leknes—of around 3,700 inhabitants, which is outnumbered only by Svolvær, located in Vågan Municipality which is home to just over 4,700 inhabitants). 

Background

The first settlement was established in the Middle Ages in Vågan, and the islands have a long history in the fishery industry that continues today, especially with cod (skrei). In fact, the fishing industry accounts for nearly 10% of employment in Nordland County (Nyrud et al., 2022). In the two municipalities at the western end of the archipelago (Værøy and Røst), the fishing industry accounts for 61% and 47% of private sector employment (McBride, 2023). However, within the past decade, the tourism industry has also grown in the Lofoten municipalities, particularly nature-based tourism. Due to the different kinds of visits, ways of passing through a destination, and the complexities of identifying a precise definition of “tourist,” tourism statistics are difficult to measure in any comprehensive way.  According to SSB, there are 618, 902 commercial guest nights in Lofoten; however, accounting for other short-term rentals as well as free camping numbers, Destination Lofoten estimates the number of annual tourists—arriving by cruise ship, car, bus, and air—at around 1 million per year. Recognising the variation in precise numbers, it is clear that the tourism industry is a significant sector for the Lofoten Islands, with an estimated 19% of all employees working in the tourism industry (interview 3).
There are several key drivers to tourism in the area, but the main attractions are the natural landscape of the mountainous islands, where visitors can hike, camp, and kayak. Popular destination points include Lofotodden National Park in Moskenes, the fishing village of Njusfjord in Flaksted, and Haukland Beach in Vestvågøy. While these areas are common environments for both international and domestic tourists, the natural landscapes are also at risk of suffering from the high numbers of tourists who contribute to pollution and denigration of the nature through irresponsible hiking and camping practices. Furthermore, some social and economic tensions also exist between visitors and those who call the islands home. In recent studies, researchers have pointed out the paradox of tourism as an ecosystem service in that the industry’s economic growth is, to some extent, dependent on ecosystem services that are “threatened by the consequences of its growth,” thereby making “nature-based tourism a potentially vulnerable system” (Antonsen et al., 2022).
The Lofoten Islands were selected as part of this report due to their major growth in tourism in recent years, but also due to the perceived imbalance of tourism across the different municipalities. Through interviews with representatives from Vestvågøy, Nordland County, and Destination Lofoten,
Destination Lofoten is the area’s official destination company working on behalf of the municipalities and tourism industries. See https://visitlofoten.com/bransjeside/hva-er-destination-lofoten/
we found that sustainability efforts are high on the agenda in the municipalities, with many policies and initiatives in place to manage tourism in socially, environmentally, and economically sustainable ways. In addition to a recent robust regional strategy for sustainable tourism, Lofoten has been named a “Sustainable Destination” by Innovation Norway, a labelling scheme developed by Innovation Norway alongside the tourism industry, research institutions, and national authorities. Recognised by the Global Sustainable Tourism Council, the scheme includes 42 criteria and 104 indicators for destinations to work towards, with the overarching aim of imbedding sustainability into the strategic work of the tourism industry (Visit Norway, n.d.-a). 
Box 1. Social sustainability-related criteria under the Sustainable Destination label
  • C1-1: The destination management must have an overview available of material and intangible culture and cultural heritage and plans in place for the responsible dissemination and use. 
  • C1-2: Active efforts must be made to develop local offerings of food and beverages.
  • D5-1: In an inclusive process, the destination management must plan and incorporate measures for the use and communication of natural and cultural areas that promote good interaction between the tourism industry, local communities, and visitors.
  • D6-1: The destination management must measure and publicly report the local communities’ ambitions, concerns, and satisfaction with the development of tourism.
  • D7-1: The destination management must work to promote more local employment, status, and pride in tourism.
  • D7-2: The destination management must take the initiative to increase expertise in areas that are important for the responsible development of tourism.
  • D8-1: The destination management must carry out visitor surveys in key customer segments. 
  • D8-2: The destination management has a system for monitoring, preventing, and publicly reporting risks, health hazards, and crime.
  • D8-3: The destination management must work to ensure that the tourism industry facilitates public access for people with special needs, as well as inform them about this on its website.
  • E9-2: Economic value creation and the ripple effects of tourism must be monitored.
  • E9-3: The destination management must work to promote balanced development of arrivals throughout the year as a basis for broad local employment and value creation.
  • E10-2: The destination management must monitor the development of employment and recruitment in tourism.
  • E10-3: The destination management promotes partnerships and supports local SMEs that develop and sell sustainable products, services, and experiences.
We protect our pure nature so that both we the people of Salla and our guests can breathe the cleanest air in the world. We take care of our mutual climate. It is a matter of honour for us to take good care of our animals. We offer experiences in the local nature.
We prefer local products and we offer local food and expertise. What we offer is clean, traditional, and local. We commit ourselves to responsible procurement and practices.
The people from Salla are as good as their word – together, we take good care of people and the environment.
Source: Visit Sal
Source. Innovation Norway, 2022.
Box 2. 10 principles outlined in the Sustainable Destination label by Innovation Norway
Conservation of Nature, Culture, and Environment
  1. Cultural identity: Respect, further develop, and highlight the local community's historical cultural heritage, authentic culture, traditions, and distinctiveness.
  2. Biodiversity: Support the conservation of natural areas, wildlife, and habitats, and minimise their destruction.
  3. Climate emissions and climate adaptation: Minimise the climate emissions of tourism and tourists, and adapt tourism to a changing climate.
  4. Clean environment and resource efficiency: Minimise pollution of air, water, and land (including noise) by tourism businesses and tourists, and reduce waste and consumption of scarce and non-renewable resources.
Strengthening of Social Values
  1. Quality of life and social Values: Preserve and enhance the quality of life in the community, including social structures, access to resources, facilities, and common goods for all, while avoiding any form of social degradation and exploitation.
  2. Local control and engagement: Engage and empower local communities and local stakeholders regarding planning, decision-making, management, and development of local tourism.
  3. Job quality for tourism employees: Enhance the quality of tourism jobs (direct and indirect), including wage levels and working conditions without discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, disabilities, or other factors.
  4. Guest satisfaction, safety, and quality of experiences: Ensure safe, satisfying, and enriching experiences for all tourists regardless of gender, race, disabilities, or other factors.
Economic Viability
  1. Economically viable and competitive tourism destinations through local value creation: Ensure the viability and competitiveness of tourism destinations in the long term, through maximising tourism's value creation in the community, including the value visitors spend locally.
Economically viable and competitive tourism businesses: Ensure the viability and competitiveness of tourism businesses in a long-term perspective.
We prefer local products and we offer local food and expertise. What we offer is clean, traditional, and local. We commit ourselves to responsible procurement and practices.
The people from Salla are as good as their word – together, we take good care of people and the environment.
Source: Visit Sal
Source. Visit Norway, n.d.-b.
The label is awarded on a commitment rather than achievement basis, meaning that labelled destinations are not yet fully sustainable, but have agreed to progress along the sustainability criteria and come under evaluation every 3 years. Thus, while sustainable tourism is a major priority, it is no surprise that, despite many efforts made by the Lofoten municipalities, several gaps and concerns remain. Some of these concerns are in regards to the small populations living in tourist-heavy pockets on the islands, difficulties with local-level funding to support tourist services, challenges to enforce the tourism code of ethics that keeps visitors accountable and responsible for caring for the destination, uneven distribution of tourism throughout Nordland County, and challenges with national level tourism regulations. This case study examines how the Lofoten Islands have worked with sustainability principles to foster sustainable tourism, with aims of maintaining environmental integrity and local community well-being, while also serving guests who travel from far and wide to visit the unique landscape.

The socio-economic context of Lofoten

The Lofoten Islands have a long history of fishing, which continues to be a major element in the coastal communities today, such as in Henningsvær, Kabelvåg, Nusfjord, and Røst. Since the Viking Age, the culture and economy were built around fisheries, specifically for Arctic cod, or skrei. But the fishing season (winter to early spring) has also been closely connected to a tradition of welcoming others into Lofoten. Traditionally, fishermen arrived from all over Norway to fish during this season, and the local people have historically received them. Therefore, the economic history of fishing in the islands has always been interwoven into the social and cultural fabric of tourism on the islands. While the fishing industry has continued, other major events and exhibition sites have also emerged that preserve the cultural heritage, such as the World Cod Fishing Championship, hosted in Svolvær since 1991. The activities celebrate both the economic history as well as cultural and natural history of the islands as a place where local inhabitants successfully developed techniques to live off the land and sea and formed cultural traditions of welcoming strangers in. 
Today, visitors from all over the world travel to Lofoten and get a taste of this heritage through new avenues of tourism. While most people pursue the islands as a nature-based tourism destination for hiking and sea activities due to the dramatic natural landscape of the archipelago, the municipalities of Lofoten have also developed their hotel and restaurant offerings highlighting traditional stockfish dishes alongside the culture of the Norwegian coastal communities. An interviewee from Destination Lofoten noted the holistic approach to the travel industry in Lofoten, emphasising that the destination has, in recent years, shifted their approach towards guest satisfaction and providing higher value experiences that attract conscientious visitors who are willing to invest in a more profound type of tourism. Focussing on things like photography workshops, ski retreats, and Northern Lights safaris are some ways that Destination Lofoten works to shape and attract particular kinds of tourists—those who may stay longer and visit outside of peak-seasons. A representative from Nordland County also highlights how the municipalities aim to share their values of hospitality with visitors around the world, rather than viewing tourism as a financial exploitation of local culture. Local populations have inherited this tradition of hospitality as a way of life, baked into the identity of many of the fishing villages, such as Ballstad in Vestvågøy. Instead of orienting the municipalities towards tourists or towards residents, those working with tourism in the region emphasise that the two go hand in hand: places that are good to live are usually good to visit; if a destination is not a nice place to visit, it is probably not a nice place to live. 
In some ways, tourism is a means of preservation—a way to keep the cultural heritage alive and to maintain pride in the landscape stewarded by and sustaining inhabitants for generations. Providing glimpses of this lifestyle is a way to continue historic practices and ideas still today. According to one representative from Destination Lofoten, tourism can enrich the life of the destination, and local populations are not threatened by, for example, losing their language, dialect, or cultural practices. And given the county-wide work with visitor management, the idea—at least in theory—is that local populations have a greater say in how and how many visitors come to Lofoten. Despite intrinsic challenges, the representatives from Destination Lofoten and Nordland County report that, on the whole, tourism is positive—both for locals and travellers. From a regional perspective, those working with tourism express that the kind of tourism offered in Lofoten is not a heavily commercial and transactional form, with aims of hosting hordes of tourists at a time; rather, the region has a slower approach where tourism should build up the local society—including those who don’t work within the tourism industry themselves. 
One example of this is with regards to local services: through an increase in tourism, municipalities like Vestvågøy gain better transport connections (e.g., flight routes) and high-quality restaurants. And greater services in general also mean that the municipality is more attractive for young people to return and settle in the municipality after studying in cities like Oslo or Bergen. According to a regional representative, young people are, in some ways, victims of tourism in that this place they know as home is oriented towards tourism. But rather than driving people out of the region, young people are also responding to this reality by seeking new ways to build the tourism industry. The region is also working on improving the transportation sector to improve the flows of tourists throughout the Lofoten municipalities to enable, for example, better bus transport at low costs, which can benefit both tourists and residents. 
The representative from Nordland County also stressed the benefits of the size and diversity of the 41 municipalities in the region. From a national perspective, the small municipalities are sometimes considered problematic—they are too small or too weak to support tourism, for example. However, the regional representative noted that these municipalities have unique cultures and strong identities, where locals are able to be involved, cope with, and, importantly, benefit from regenerative tourism opportunities. 
But while welcoming visitors is a long tradition in this corner of Norway, the kind of hospitality required of local populations has changed over the years as the Lofoten Islands have become more popular with both domestic and international travellers. The interviewees from regional and local levels described the inevitable difficulties due to the number of visitors compared to local population. Vestvågøy is home to some of the most popular beaches and hiking destinations in Norway, but the local communities are dramatically overpowered by visitors. Based on measurements of car movements and hiking around the beaches of Uttakleiv and Haukland, visitors outnumber residents 30,000 to 1 in some areas. Despite some improvements to local services, the high numbers of tourists passing through these destinations places a substantial strain on small communities, the nature, and the local infrastructure. The roads along these northwestern coastal villages, for example, are quite narrow, and there are several small farms in the area. Visitors who come to park at the beaches or hike through the mountains create congestion on the roads, scare away the sheep, and create new demands for services like toilets and wayfinding that are not required by the locals alone. The municipalities need to cater to the needs of tourists and improve visitor experience by providing clear signs and knowledge that equips them while protecting locals from being infringed upon. While these concerns do not threaten local culture per se, they do impact residents’ daily life.  
According to one municipal representative of Vestvågøy, inhabitants of many micro-communities (10-30 local residents) living in popular destinations often report negative perceptions of tourism compared to other parts of the municipality. Despite these areas attracting many visitors due to the natural landscape and hiking opportunities, few people in such communities are working with the tourism industry and therefore do not see direct benefits from visitors passing through. But even in some larger communities where more people work with tourism, the large-scale visibility of the environmental impacts of tourism are difficult to escape—for example, in the port of Leknes where cruise ships dock throughout the year.   
In instances in where the locals feel encroached upon by the volume of visitors, the region is also working to support them with rules and regulations that enable some beaches, for example, to be protected or developed with local needs in mind. In some areas, locals have led the charge. By working with various actors and their municipality, they have established some fees for tourists to access natural areas, such as certain beaches that local residents want to keep clean and uncrowded. In other cases, residents have led initiatives to prevent camping in certain areas, or limited camping by tent, but not with a camper van or car. These kinds of initiatives are ways for residents to receive guests, but on their own terms. Importantly, local communities are not homogeneous groups, and while some inhabitants benefit from the increase in visitors—not merely economically but also socially—the crowds of tourists can also make other inhabitants feel like strangers in their own home. 
Much of the tensions around tourism in the Lofoten Islands comes down to trust—trust between local inhabitants and visitors as well as trust between the local inhabitants and the municipality or county council. The sustainability coordinator from Destination Lofoten emphasised how those living in Norway, and particularly among large stretches of nature, have grown up with a sense of respect for the environment from an early age. Cultural norms like following the path or leaving no trace may be common sense for local inhabitants, but these ways of life are not always obvious to tourists who have not been exposed to these kinds of natural environments outside their front doors. The discrepancies create a lot of practical issues for the municipalities—like dealing with human waste in the rivers (which affects the water source). While cruise ships are often the most visible form of tourism in the key port towns of the Lofoten Islands, some of the major issues often come from those using motor homes and rental cars who camp or park in inappropriate areas. In some cases, ignorance or unfamiliarity with these natural environments can put tourists themselves at risk—for example, by not understanding what kinds of shoes or clothing may be necessary for safely navigating a hike. Some initiatives have been implemented to respond to these concerns, such as the Sporløs Lofotturisme project. Researchers from the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) worked to map the wastes problem in Lofoten, interview tourists about their experiences, and develop the foundations for a long-term waste management programme that helps make tourism more sustainable in the popular hiking destination of Lofotodden National Park, and elsewhere around Lofoten (NINA, 2021).
In addition to building trust between tourists and local inhabitants, there is also lack of trust between some smaller communities and the municipality or region when it comes to responding to tourism. Some civil servants are dedicated to bridging the gap between inhabitants of small communities and the municipality as well as the County Council in order to find better solutions and work towards common goals. Locals need to feel they are heard and that their suggestions are taken into account when it comes to questions of where tourists can go or how to place a cap on the volume of visitors passing through their communities. 

Tourism governance structure in Lofoten

As a region, Nordland County established a robust tourism strategy (Strategi for reiseliv og opplevelser i Nordland 2023–2027) to guide the region towards regenerative tourism practices. While the strategy comes from a business perspective, it takes a holistic approach and aims for solutions that strengthen both the tourism experience and the sustainable development of the municipalities:
Regenerative means a form of tourism whose ambition is to contribute to the renewal of resources and create positive added value for local communities, the climate, and the environment. In other words, regenerative tourism takes sustainability further than trying to avoid damage or compensate for it. … The focus is on how visitors can help to leave a destination in better condition than when they arrived. This includes supporting local value creation as well as preserving local cultural and natural resources. (Nordland fylkeskommune, Forord)
This approach of regenerative tourism has emerged elsewhere around the world, but the Nordland County strategy is a breakthrough in Norway, especially with regards to integrating tourism into other sectors, such as transportation, education, and the environment. The strategy involved participatory processes via meetings with local actors and the tourism industry, municipalities, and politicians. And the regional representatives noted the importance of involving local leaders and considering local conditions when creating the strategy. For example, open meetings where local farmers could express concerns regarding overtourism and discuss how to receive guests in a different way. One such area is Vågan, a municipality of just under 10,000 residents that receives a high number of visitors, especially in the town of Svolvær and the surrounding mountains and pinnacles such as the picturesque Svolværgeita. The municipality aims to develop visitor management solutions that build up the local society while also supporting tourism. Insights from the local level were taken up in the regional strategic work to understand how tourists could be received in a more integrative manner that serves both parties.  
The strategy also highlights how popular tourist destinations require innovative systems to respond to challenges and facilitate value creation for sustainable development. In some regions, this may be through regional actors that can build collaborative efforts for local development, visitor management, and marketing. Destination Lofoten is one example of this.
Destination Lofoten is a destination management company owned by a combination of stakeholders from the private sector (e.g., hotels, activity providers, restaurants, and experience companies) as well as the public sector (i.e., the six municipalities in Lofoten). The company has the mandate to work with visitor management, uniting place and tourism development, facilitation, comprehensive planning, and coordination among municipalities. Their aim is to “ensure development that is within the limits of what nature, landscape, environment, local community, and local culture can tolerate, while also providing a basis for healthy business operations and local value creation” (Visit Lofoten, n.d.-b)
One of the tangible efforts made by Destination Lofoten at the local level, has been the promotion of the Lofoten Code of Conduct (Box 3). Adapted from Norway’s national mountain guide rules, the Lofoten Code of Conduct is a way to present tourists with clear guidelines for how to engage with the natural and social environment of the Lofoten Islands. It guides visitors to make good decisions by educating them on basic principles for waste management, camping, and respecting local inhabitants. Destination Lofoten collaborates with Lofoten Friluftsråd to ensure the Code of Conduct is visible throughout Lofoten where tourists may be hiking or passing through.
Box 3. The Lofoten Code of Conduct
  1. CAMP IN DESIGNATED AREAS (see map here)
  2. LEAVE NO TRACE – Avoid leaving traces in nature, such as cairns, tent pegs etc. Allow others to have the same great experience that you’ve had.
  3. FOLLOW THE PATH AND AVOID THE CREATION OF NEW PATHS
  4. THROW WASTE IN THE WASTE BINS – If you are in an area without bins, bring your waste with you until you can dispose of it.
  5. USE PUBLIC TOILETS – If none are present, go in the ocean or dig a pit in the ground (bring paper with you, and cover the hole). Avoid using wet wipes, as they take a long time to decompose.
  6. RESPECT PRIVATE PROPERTY – Camping closer than 150 metres from an occupied house or cabin is forbidden. You can only camp on cultivated land if you have an agreement with the land owner.
  7. BE CONSIDERATE IN TRAFFIC – The roads in Lofoten are narrow, yet many use them. Keep well clear of cyclists when passing them. Be especially mindful of bicycles in tunnels.
  8. BAN ON FIRES – During the summer months, there is a general ban on open fires. Use designated sites for fire, and make sure there is no risk of a forest fire.
  9. RESPECT WILDLIFE – Avoid disturbing animals unnecessarily. Dogs must be kept on a leash at all times.
  10. IN THE INTEREST OF THE ENVIRONMENT, as well as your own experience and safety, we recommend activities organised by a tour operator. You can find a list of such organisers at www.visitlofoten.com.
Source. Visit Lofoten, n.d.-a.
The region employs guards or hosts in some tourist areas as another way to reduce the risks of injuries or accidents, especially around popular hiking destinations. They also work with Lofoten friluftsfråd when it comes to measuring flows of people to identify areas most heavily affected by tourists. With better data, the municipalities can make a stronger case for acquiring the right funding to manage or provide services to these areas, such as bus routes. In 2021, outdoor recreation regulations (Friluftsforskrift for Lofoten, Røst, Værøy, Moskenes, Flakstad, Vestvågøy og Vågan kommuner, Nordland) were established in order to safeguard water sources, limit public access to protect nature, and promote overall nature-friendly recreation in cooperation with landowners. The regulation defines 14 areas that disallow tent camping and 4 areas that limit caravan and motorhome parking. These regulations are dynamic tools for tourism management and will continue to be revised with the inclusion or exclusion of various areas. The region also works to identify the heavy burden placed on local and regional infrastructure such as roads to gain more national support for maintenance that accounts not only for the 25,000 inhabitants, but the high quantities of visitors that utilise these streets and services throughout the year.
Local level governance is critical in the municipalities of Lofoten, especially in popular destination areas where communities face both benefits and tensions due to tourism. In parts of Vestvågøy, civil servants work with a matrix of hotspot areas (e.g., Unsted, Effum, Uttekleiv, Haulkand, and Vik) to manage things like parking, sanitation, and ongoing projects. But many challenges remain when it comes to funding, action, communication, and trust. 
One local representative working with business relations in a municipality highlighted difficulties for the Lofoten Islands to be made up of six different administrative areas rather than one unified administration. From a business perspective, it could be beneficial for these municipalities to coalesce so that they can better serve the 25,000 residents scattered across them. The municipalities vary greatly in terms of population—from Vestvågøy with 11,600 inhabitants, to Røst, with less than 500 at the western end of the archipelago. But each of these municipalities are responsible for providing various services and responding to tourism demands, leaving some municipalities in particularly precarious situations. Vågan, with 9,793 inhabitants, experienced some financial trouble in 2023 and has needed to close schools and other services to save money, yet the municipality is home to some of the highest numbers of tourists. A more collaborative effort is needed to ensure that the municipalities can respond to the pressures of tourism while also serving the needs of residents. 
The local municipalities have followed the work of the regional government when it comes to the approaches of visitor management and regenerative tourism. The municipalities have also been able to inform the county about local ways of working. One key takeaway from this has been that visitor management is a cross-cutting theme for the Lofoten municipalities. Rather than being relegated to the work of tourism, local administrations view it as a key approach that influences or plays a role in all other areas of development—whether that be business planning, social or cultural aspects, or spatial planning. And the concept is highly relevant for ensuring that when residents allow visitors into their neighbourhoods, they get something in return—financially or culturally—that benefits them. 
Representatives from the local and regional levels expressed further needs for support from the national level: with more visitors comes the need for more tools and stricter regulations to control the flows of tourists. In addition to local regulations for things like camping and parking, some municipalities also express an interest in concrete visitor management through a “visitor contribution” or tourist tax. Furthermore, regional representatives also raised the point that national guidelines could better guide international guests. While national regulations like the Outdoor Recreation Act (Friluftsloven) help to define basic principles (e.g., requiring consent from landowners for camping in a destination more than two nights), some alternatives to the Nordic allemansrätten or freedom to roam may be important to enforce for areas with high levels of international tourists. While this right provides local people the freedom to move, it also assumes a certain level of basic trust and respect for the area—something that may be unique to international visitors from contexts where such freedoms don’t exist. National guidelines could be installed to safeguard hotspot areas and their local communities so that the burden of managing or educating visitors does not fall on residents. One interviewee also highlighted the lack of a minister for tourism in the Norwegian government which could otherwise help to provide direction on tourism management from a national level. 
At the same time, if too many national regulations are put in place, these could burden local municipalities if they require time and resources to meet certain standards. The work could also take away from the localised needs of the communities. 

Knowledge exchange among government actors and industry

To continue learning, the region works with many different actors in and beyond the tourism industry at conferences for experience-based tourism. The region also hosts courses for municipalities to look into visitor management and to understand the regional tourism strategy and how its aims can be worked out at the local level. Some local level actors also participate in international visitor management conferences. For example, the representative from Vestvågøy has participated in discussions around the UNESCO system and learned from experiences abroad in places like Canada and Iceland.

Discussion

As previously noted, many local communities benefit from high levels of tourism by also gaining access to goods and services they would otherwise lack—such as restaurants, more grocery stores and shopping, and improved transportation services. However, not all tourist services cater to locals. Haukland Beach is one popular destination where the municipality felt pressure to develop a visitor centre to accommodate the high number of tourists, especially during the summer months when visitors flock to the area to enjoy the dramatic scenes of the midnight sun. The municipality received some funding from the National Department of Roads and the county administration; but the municipality still contributed 26 million NOK of the 55 million NOK project on their own to fund parking facilities, a service building, and improved sewage systems to accommodate large quantities of guests during their visits (predominantly in the summer months). While these facilities can be used by residents, tensions arise when, for example, local inhabitants are required to pay for parking at a facility which they have already financially contributed to through taxes. The example highlights the concerns around who the municipality has invested for and who benefits. 
Destination Lofoten is also working closely with airlines to improve international connections. The Evenes airport, about 2.5 hours drive from the Lofoten Islands, is one of the most weather-safe airports; therefore, enabling more international airlines to connect to this route has the potential to improve year-round tourism. The municipalities have been working towards year-round tourism as a way to ensure full-time employment, which means people can settle down and invest in the area rather than only in the high season of May to September. In the past, there have been many seasonal workers, which has posed some challenges to economic development in the community since the workers hold their permanent address in other cities, thereby contributing through taxes outside of their Lofoten communities. Increasing winter tourism and year-round employment opportunities is likely to increase local revenue through investments in housing and local shops and services in all seasons. 
Given the strong connections between industry and politicians, the tourism industry is, according to some regional representatives, a good industry to work in within Norway, and will continue to play a role in the future. But Nordland County as a whole is made up of 41 municipalities, many of which are less than 2,000 citizens, and many even with less than 500. Tourism is not the primary industry in all municipalities, but the regional representatives stress that this is not necessary. Each have their own identity and context, so while there is a potential for uneven distributions (with some municipalities gaining greater economic benefits from tourism), other municipalities benefit through different industries and exports.   
Working hand-in-hand with the tourism industry in the Lofoten Islands is the fishing industry. By working together, the harbours become common tourist destinations and places for traditional fishing services. But different fishing towns and villages respond to tourism in unique ways. In Vestvågøy’s Ballstad Habour, the area has maintained a policy to preserve its fishing community and refused the development of large hotels to accommodate visitors.  Compared to areas like Svolvær in Vågan Municipality where tourists can find larger hotels, Vestvågøy has relied on traditional fisherman’s cabins, smaller apartments, and short-term rentals through platforms like AirBnB to accommodate visitors. The neighbouring municipalities highlight two distinct approaches—in one case, the municipality wants to ban AirBnB because it creates competition between short-term rentals for tourists and seasonal workers struggling to find housing; meanwhile, in Vestvågøy, the municipality benefits from AirBnB rentals without which very few people would stay overnight in the area. These overnight stays contribute more to the local people who can make money from tourism instead of remaining a place where people pass through to use the nature while staying in overnight accommodations in neighbouring municipalities. 
The regenerative tourism approach in the Lofoten Islands is one way for tourists to become part of the solution to protecting and restoring nature. The idea that visitors should leave no trace is encouraged through the Code of Conduct but also in other initiatives, such as inviting visitors to participate in low-impact activities (e.g., kayaking, horseback-riding, or snow-shoeing) or to pick up plastic from the sea during their visit. Establishing sherpa stairs has been another way to manage visitors. The stone steps have less impact on the natural environment compared to other methods and encourage visitors to stay on the path when hiking. However, it is easy for local inhabitants to associate tourism to negative climate and environmental impacts. Visually, the presence of large cruise ships in the ports exuding smoke leads to negative perceptions of tourists choosing these methods for visiting the area. When it comes to air travel, regional representatives make the case that providing ease of travel to Lofoten can actually reduce the overall footprint for tourists. As of spring 2024, a route from Frankfurt to Evenes airport opened. Those traveling from all over the world to experience the islands will still have a carbon footprint, but if they can arrive by two flights rather than four or five, their travel will be somewhat more environmentally friendly. Enabling smoother air travel also enables visitors to stay in the region longer and spend more time both contributing to the local economy and understanding the local community. 

Conclusion and recommendations

Drawing from Lofoten’s  insights, the essential strategies for promoting socially sustainable tourism include:
  • Strengthen Local Governance and Collaboration: Improve coordination between municipalities to ensure a unified approach to tourism management, and foster stronger collaboration between local authorities, tourism operators, and community members. In Lofoten, trust among residents, tourists, and local leaders is crucial for effective governance.
  • Implement Comprehensive Visitor Management Strategies: Develop strategies to manage the flow of tourists, particularly in high-traffic areas, and invest in infrastructure improvements to mitigate the impact of high visitor numbers. Local perceptions of visitor management vary, and more needs to be done to operationalize these strategies in small communities.
  • Promote Sustainable Tourism Practices: Launch educational campaigns to inform tourists about responsible behaviour and continue and expand environmental conservation initiatives. Efforts to protect the natural environment and the ways of life of local inhabitants are essential.
  • Enhance Economic Benefits for Local Communities: Provide support and incentives for local businesses to thrive and develop and promote year-round tourism activities to reduce seasonal fluctuations. Ensuring smart economic growth contextualized to the region is vital.
  • Address Social and Cultural Impacts: Ensure local residents are actively involved in tourism planning and decision-making processes and promote and preserve local cultural heritage through support for traditional crafts and festivals. Small communities in highly sought-out natural landscapes are often infringed upon, and there is a lack of clarity regarding who benefits from the services developed.
  • Improve Data Collection and Monitoring: Develop comprehensive indicators to measure the social, economic, and environmental impacts of tourism, and conduct regular assessments of tourism impacts and adjust strategies as needed. Regular assessments will help in understanding and mitigating the impacts of tourism.