The fieldwork revealed a number of common challenges connected to eID rollout and usage among the population. However, larger societal challenges were also noted. The notion of “digital debt” was raised in several interviews, described as Åland lagging behind in digitalisation and needing to catch up regarding technological advancements, digital systems and digital literacy among the population (Interviewees Å01, Å03, Å06 & Å11). One interviewee explained, “I have a perception that we have a digital debt in Åland that needs to be paid off. We are behind other regions when it comes to digitalisation. That includes not only having the infrastructure in place, but also digital processes and digital behaviour. I perceive that digital maturity is low here” (Interviewee Å08).
Digital maturity was a concept discussed by other interviewees as well, with some arguing that digital maturity in Åland is lower than in the neighbouring countries, contributing to the digital debt (Interviewee Å04, Å08 & Å10). Increasing digital skills within businesses, the public sector and the population was seen as a key factor in improving Åland’s digital maturity (Interviewees Å03 & Å05). Interviewees discussed the consequences of this digital debt, noting that, in terms of digital exclusion, there is a risk that Åland as a whole could be digitally excluded from neighbouring countries (Interviewee Å08). The consequences of this were noted by another interviewee: “The entire society will become less competitive if other regions around us are much more digital. So, the vision is for Åland to be a highly digital society, but everyone living here must be able to use the services and feel that they benefit from using them, rather than it being a burden” (Interviewee Å03).
The pros and cons of being a small community are evident in Åland. While the close-knit nature of the community can facilitate communication and support, it also means that resources and expertise are limited. In such a small society, people tend to know each other well, which fosters a sense of familiarity and trust. The small society means that communication channels to stakeholders or decision makers are short, making it possible to gather almost all the important stakeholders for a given topic in the same room (Interviewee Å02 & Å09). According to one participant, Åland's small size is advantageous, making it an ideal test bed for new initiatives due to its manageable size and quick communication channels. This flexibility and agility facilitate the implementation of new systems, digital solutions or policies (Interviewee Å04). However, in small communities like Åland, social control and a lack of anonymity can also hinder people from voicing their complaints in fear of stigmatisation. This leads to a form of social self-censorship, with potentially controversial topics not being discussed beyond familiar circles of trusted individuals. Despite the accessibility of local policymakers, there is a siloed atmosphere, where group-specific challenges are not brought constructively into the public discourse (Interviewee Å10).
Åland faces unique challenges and opportunities compared to mainland Finland with respect to digitalisation. One significant difference lies in the digitalisation efforts and the adoption of eID. While Finland has made considerable progress in the field of digitalisation, Åland has struggled to keep pace. This disparity is partly due to Åland's smaller size and limited resources, which make it challenging to develop and implement large-scale digital systems independently. This is compounded by Åland's digitalisation efforts being relatively new and a lack of dedicated staff to drive these initiatives forward until quite recently (Interviewee Å02 & Å03). Additionally, Åland's autonomy and the use of Swedish as its official language have sometimes led to challenges in directly adopting Finnish systems. Respondents note that Åland has faced challenges in integrating fully with these systems due to its legal, linguistic and administrative status (Interviewee Å02, Å03, Å05).
4.3.3 Solutions: Future-proofing eID access in a changing landscape
To address the challenges of eID and digital inclusion, several solutions have been implemented or proposed. Banks, as issuers of eIDs, provide digital support services. These services are available when opening a bank account or when registering for the bank’s eID solution, providing assistance with any questions related to eID (Interviewee Å02).
Various identification methods and analogue services are still offered to ensure that those who cannot access digital services and solutions are not left behind. Many services requiring eID can still be accessed using analogue methods or other types of e-authentication. These include code charts with a code calculator (kodtabell), mobile certificates (electronic identifiers in a mobile phone's SIM card obtained from the mobile operator) and certificate cards (identity cards containing a citizen certificate or organisation cards containing an organisation certificate) used with a card reader and card reader program. These solutions and other types of e-identification options can be used for various purposes, such as accessing banks, online banking, tax services, insurance and handling public e-services like Suomi.fi (Interviewee Å02). Additionally, tasks such as banking can be done in person, although this depends on factors such as the availability of staff, opening hours and geographical locations.
Many interviewees emphasised the importance of maintaining alternative identification and login solutions, as well as analogue services, to ensure that everyone can access essential services, including those who cannot or do not want to use digital solutions (Interviewee Å02, Å06, Å07 & Å10). One interviewee noted, “We are undeniably moving towards an increasingly digital world. However, it’s clear that not everyone is keeping up with this development. Alternative or complementary options must still be offered to cover different needs” (Interviewee Å10). While Åland may adopt a “digital first” approach in the future, with digital solutions being the default, there remains the option to opt out of and use analogue methods (Interviewee Å03 & Å04).
ICT courses are provided to improve digital literacy and skills among the population. These courses are essential for increasing digital skills and are aimed at including all user groups in digital society, emphasising the importance of digital inclusion. For example, pensioner associations and other organisations provide training on using smartphones, tablets and computers, focusing on daily needs rather than advanced software (Interviewee Å03, Å09, Å12). However, interviewees noted the continuous need for ICT courses (Interviewee Å01). One initiative highlighted as beneficial was the effort to increase online safety and security. For example, banks or the police held information sessions on how to manage online banking and shop safely online (Interviewee Å01).
One future vision Åland is exploring is a single login portal for all public services in Åland, i.e. an Ålandic citizen portal, allowing users to submit applications and sign documents with their eID. This system is intended to be connected to Finnish services like Suomi.fi. According to the vision, digital services would become more accessible and efficient, reducing the need for physical visits and paperwork and creating a seamless digital experience for all residents, including those in remote areas (Interviewee Å03). The aim is for everyone to be comfortable using digital services, making Åland a mature digital society (Interviewee Å02). However, for this to occur, interviewees argue that more resources and initiatives are needed to help users understand and use eID and to increase digital competences overall (Interviewee Å01, Å06, Å10).
Libraries also play an important role in this regard, serving as low-threshold service points and meeting places in Åland, open to all members of society. Libraries play a crucial role in digital inclusion by providing access to the internet, digital devices, media and information courses and providing basic assistance with digital issues, helping users navigate the digital landscape and avoid the spread of false information. This support is vital for those who are not yet comfortable with digital technology (Interviewee Å09 & Å11). Interviewees argued that third sector organisations, libraries and community centres should receive funding for IT education, as this issue affects both older and younger populations. They emphasised the importance of creating more accessible places where users can receive assistance with digital services and receive training in digital skills (Interviewee Å01).
Involving user groups in the early stages of policy implementation or product development can prevent exclusion and ensure that services meet their needs. A dual focus on developing secure services and educating users to identify risks was seen as crucial (Interviewee Å04). As one interviewee underlined, “It’s essential to ensure that everyone has the skills and knowledge needed to participate in this digital society; we need to promote both education and awareness” (Interviewee Å08). User-friendly design is crucial to making digital services more accessible and easier to use and is therefore essential for digital inclusion. Projects must take account of accessibility for all user groups, including those with disabilities. This involves ensuring that digital interfaces are easy to read and navigate, with options to enlarge text and simplify complex forms. Banks and other service providers must comply with accessibility directives to avoid excluding users (Interviewee Å02 & Å04).
Future visions and plans include finding a secure digital mobile solution that is compliant and easy to use, as code tables will not be sufficiently secure (Interviewee Å04). As noted above, Finland is exploring plans for developing a state-issued eID. Åland is awaiting that decision and will see how it will fit into the Ålandic context (Interviewee Å02 & Å03). The pros and cons of a state-issued eID are being debated. A state-issued eID could provide a more standardised and secure identification method, reducing reliance on banks and ensuring broader access to digital services (Interviewee Å02 & Å04). It would allow for the development of government services without relying on banks, making it easier for users to access services. While some may prefer to use their bank for this purpose, a state-issued eID could simplify the process and reduce the number of steps required to obtain an eID. However, interviewees speculated that Ålanders would still prefer to have the option for a private bank-issued eID (Interviewee Å07).
Developing and maintaining a state-issued eID system could be costly and complex, especially for a small community like Åland. The majority of interviewees argued against Åland developing its own eID system, favouring the adaptation of a potential Finnish solution. There has been limited dialogue between Åland and Finland on developing a unified eID system, although recent legislative efforts in Finland may pave the way for better cooperation in the future. Adopting a Finnish eID solution and tailoring it to fit the Ålandic context was seen as beneficial and cost-efficient (Interviewees Å02, Å03, Å05, Å12).