The project was depicted as a high-cost failure in the media (Dagens Nyheter 2023): despite a total budget of SEK 70 million, it only succeeding in attract 38 workers to Skellefteå and no unemployed women at all from Malmö. Nevertheless, several institutional bottlenecks were identified (Relocate 2023).
First, there is no national system in place to provide internal migration incentives, despite the acute need for coordination between different policy areas. In particular, a coordination body present at both the place of origin and the intended destination is a prerequisite for facilitating migration. When it came to Relocate, the national employment agency’s changed mission, with less responsibility of matching, coupled with the presence of several standalone (private) employment agencies, made coordination difficult. Ultimately, it was concluded that although private actors could potentially take on a coordinating role, they currently have no incentive to encourage mobility to another municipality, only to direct the unemployed towards either education or work in the relevant vicinity.
Second, the current adult training regulations (especially concerning adult education like komvux, but also vocational training) make migration difficult, with approval from the relevant national agency and municipality necessary in order to migrate for the purposes of undertaking training.
Third, the current subsidies do not cover the actual monetary costs associated with long-distance migration, further reducing the propensity to migrate, especially for those in more peripheral labour market positions.
Finally, and relatedly, migration is made less attractive by the lack of affordable housing in expanding areas with housing shortages.
The project concludes that these various obstacles and institutional barriers make it almost impossible to address the spatial mismatch of vacancies and unemployment. As such, policy adjustments are required to make inter-regional migration more appealing.
Akademi Norr (2024) has coordinated a local supply/demand mapping initiative funded by the European Social Fund and the initiative members (municipalities and Västerbotten and Norrbotten counties) designed to provide local prognoses on future labour demand in northern Sweden. This is in response to the insufficient detail on rural areas provided by the employment agency’s occupational prognoses as, typically, too few rural workers are engaged in the occupation under scrutiny. For example, only a single occupation is given a prognosis in the rural municipalities of Jokkmokk and Arjeplog. Such regions must therefore either conduct their own mapping or rely on the national forecast.
Given the diverse occupational structures present across Sweden’s regions (Hane-Weijman et al. 2022), national forecasts seldom match current or future labour demands in small rural areas. Thus, rather than each municipality funding its own forecast, the Akademi Norr-coordinated project will help identify common needs among adjacent municipalities. This in turn means education and training can be tailored and jointly coordinated according to the region’s broader demands, allowing project costs related to vocational training and high-school education to be shared.
Both Skellefteå municipality (Welcome House) and several municipalities in Norrbotten (e.g. Boden and Piteå) have established relocation service hubs aimed at assisting prospective and newly arrived migrants to find jobs and housing, as well as help accompanying spouses settle in. Given that moving to a new place is often fraught with uncertainty, especially if the incomer is coming from another country, such hubs have been tasked with limiting perceived bureaucratic obstacles and facilitating contact with the authorities. As discussed by Nyström (2021), this is one of many local services that could encourage inward migration, especially in the case of dual career households.
Overall, such initiatives point to the need for local flexibility in addressing challenges, as successful recruitment hinges on the challenging task of being willing to experiment while also being effective.
Conclusions
Neither the causes of, nor solutions to, rural skills shortages can be easily summarised. Shortages may be the result of an absolute shortage of working age people, shortfalls in the types of skills sought be employers, or preconceptions of who possesses the ‘right’ type of skills. The latter encompasses discriminatory structures related to, for example, gender, ethnicity and disability, which although not explicitly discussed in this chapter can influence perceptions of skills supply (e.g. Berlina & Cavicchia 2024; Grip & Jansson 2022) and shape narratives around skills mismatches and corresponding policy interventions (Tillväxtanalys 2024).
In discussing the regional dimensions of skills supply, this chapter has sought to demonstrate that the local reasons behind skills shortages vary. The key challenge facing many of Sweden’s rural regions is an absolute shortage of workers, which has been exacerbated in some regions by demand shocks related to rapid re-industrialisation. At the same time, there are municipalities (rural and particularly urban) with varying vacancy rates that are also experiencing high unemployment. This indicates local pockets of mismatch, with vacancies not matching the skills of the unemployed both in broader functional regions around urban cores and in relatively solitary rural regions. Moreover, it points to a spatial mismatch between vacancies on the one hand and the unemployed on the other.
Local variations, and spatial mismatches arising from this, present a key policy challenge. As exemplified by the case of Skellefteå, several obstacles stand in the way of realising migration from southern Sweden. In particular, the experiences of the Relocate project demonstrate that some form of coordinating body is needed. The previous section’s survey of recent policy initiatives reveals that general incentives aimed at overcoming barriers to the labour market seldom consider local specificities, limiting their ability to solve the mismatch puzzle. Given that consideration of local demand helps increase the efficiency of an intervention, more regional wisdom is needed. In light of this, the initiative taken in Norr- and Västerbotten to coordinate a thorough skills survey and then tailor training and education accordingly appears highly promising, as otherwise many rural municipalities would need to conduct surveys independently or rely on national forecasts. While national forecasts are valuable, they presume almost frictionless mobility and are unlikely to mirror the demands of those places most in need of support.
Although skills supply is seen as a key challenge by both business and the public sector, there remains a lack of clarity when it comes to responsibility and mandate. As Forslund (2024) shows, this is particularly evident at the state and regional levels. Consequently, while everyone considers skills supply to be a problem, no one is actually responsible for the issue, be it employers, municipalities and regions, various intermediary actors or the state. The Relocate project’s failure to attract people from Stockholm and Malmö to Skellefteå is illustrative of how the changed mandate of the employment agency since 2021, together with the fragmented service provided by private agencies, has helped create this void in responsibility. To address this, there must be a clearly designated actor tasked with coordinating both the areas receiving and sending workers. In doing so, the actor should work to mitigate bureaucratic obstacles around migration, education and housing.
The policy of public administration centralisation pursued in Sweden over recent decades has had a negative impact on the ability of rural regions to deal with skills supply. For example, the employment agency has stepped back from many locales, either completely disappearing from rural municipalities or providing reduced resources. This has meant municipalities taking on greater responsibility for meeting the needs of those furthest from the labour market via livelihood support, as well as providing the tools needed to facilitate skills matching and knowledge building through education and skills development. At the same time, the budgets available to municipalities – especially many rural municipalities – are limited, with a relatively small group of officials responsible for making strategic and impactful decisions. Given the varying resources and capacities of municipalities, it is questionable whether they should be burdened with this responsibility, as success in dealing with skills supply issues may come down to the capacity for innovation shown by individual municipality officials, together with their ability to mobilise relevant actors.