Go to content
Trondheim. Photo: Martin Håndlykken/Visit Norway

Climate neutrality in Nordic Cities: a multi level governance perspective

Part II of this report explores the policies, strategies and tools Nordic cities use to pursue climate neutrality through spatial planning. It is organised into five subchapters, one for each Nordic country. For each country chapter, the analysis highlights two case study cities: one identified as a frontrunner (Aarhus, Tampere, Reykjavík, Trondheim and Lund) and the other as a striver (Vejle, Oulu, Kristiansand and Växjö). For each case study, we apply our conceptual framework (see Figure 3) to demonstrate how an institutional perspective can shed light on the diverse challenges that Nordic cities face in their efforts to achieve climate neutrality.
For each case study, we first present the overarching local climate strategies and key policies for the three sectors: land use, transport and buildings. Second, we apply a multilevel governance perspective to discuss local policy capacity, assessed through financial dependence, regulatory autonomy and governance tensions at both the vertical and horizontal levels.
In our framework, policy capacity also encompasses political will, which we explored in the previous chapter by illustrating the commitment of each city to climate neutrality.
We then go on to explore how institutional capacity – i.e. knowledge resources, relational resources and mobilisation capacity – affects local climate efforts. Each country chapter concludes with an overview of the key challenges in achieving climate neutrality, along with broader implications and potential solutions.
Figure 3. Conceptual framework
Policy capacity
→
  • Political will
  • Regulatory autonomy
  • Financial (in)dependence
Institutional capacity
→
  • Knowledge resources
  • Relational resources
  • Mobilisation capacity
Created by the authors
Policy capacity involves both the ability and political will to address social and environmental challenges via effective decision-making, planning and implementation. In multilevel governance (MLG) settings, local autonomy is shaped by: 
  1. Regulatory autonomy: The level of independence that local or regional authorities have in policymaking, influenced by national regulations and central government decisions.
  2. Financial dependence: The extent of local reliance on state funding, which varies from strong central support to situations where local governments generate their own resources with minimal state aid.
Institutional capacity includes three key dimensions:
  1. Knowledge resources: This dimension refers to the understanding of complex, multi-dimensional challenges related to climate neutrality (social, environmental, economic) by planners and stakeholders.
  2. Relational resources: Social networks and trust among stakeholders that facilitate collaboration across scales, especially within climate-focused municipal networks that disseminate knowledge and best practices to support local action.
  3. Mobilisation capacity: This is the ability to use knowledge and networks to enact change by addressing power dynamics and creating conditions for collective action, which is crucial for advancing climate goals.
Both policy and institutional capacity are analysed in the project through a multilevel governance lens, exploring both vertical and horizontal governance tensions.